Researching any info re: Paul Cunningham, Competition Cobra privateer

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[Nedsel]

Originally Posted by CompClassics

Well, for one if there is verifiable proof that the car that Wesselink and Hasselrig have is a new build with UNVERIFIABLE components, which it is, than it should be addressed as such and the original deemed destroyed.
The SAAC Registry is supposed to be a way of keeping track of legitimate Cobras, if this is not the case it might has well be considered a volume of short stories based on fiction.

John, it is sad that your anger at Richard Wesselink is preventing you from seeing reality. The Registry is constantly updated, and has stated for a long time that the car you had been working on was a brand new build created by the final entity to claim any AC Cars ownership, which was Alan Lubinsky. The Registry further notes that whatever remained of the original chassis ended up in the Netherlands following its claimed theft from a CA storage facility. It is not "destroyed" as you claim. The Registry does its best to describe the odd convolutions that certain chassis numbers endure. The fact that reality fails to suit your wishes does not diminish its purpose.

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[Nedsel]

Originally Posted by CompClassics

By the way, it’s not “hate”, it’s about what is right and what is wrong and the position that Wesselink nearly put me in. The position you are in now.

I agree with the right/wrong scenario; we simply differ on the criteria we use to arrive at our conclusions. And Wesselink hasn't put me in any "position" at all, in as much as I am not under any contractual obligations to him.

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[Nedsel]

Originally Posted by CompClassics

Yep, one version is based on fiction and the other nonfiction.

Although your jurisprudence acumen is impressive, I must remind you that we are both bound by the determination of the Orange County, CA Superior Court. As soon as you have successfully challenged their final judgement and it has been overturned, please let me know.

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[Nedsel]

Originally Posted by CompClassics

“The Registry further notes that whatever remained of the original chassis ended up in the Netherlands following its claimed theft from a CA storage facility. It is not "destroyed" as you claim.”

Are you now saying that you recognize the car in the Netherlands to have the chassis to 2049, wouldn’t this in fact make it 2049 regardless of the courts findings? You really can’t say that something isn’t what it is because of a court decision.

Since the car was listed as having been stolen, even if the chassis in the Netherlands is that of 2049 it can not, according to US law, claim legal ownership of the VIN.

[CompClassics]

Deleted

[Nedsel]

Originally Posted by CompClassics

You can not dismiss the fact that the original chassis exists in the Netherlands, you said it yourself “it was not destroyed”.

Which changes nothing.