Quote:
Personally, I think most of us here bought a Kirkham for the liberal use of lightweight aluminum throughout the car. And some of us said that installing an iron block in a virtually all aluminum Cobra makes/made no sense. Finally, weight savings wasn't the only reason I bought my Shelby aluminum block. The Shelby block was made in America and, at the time of purchase, was about $1,000-$1,500 more than an iron block. So, the Shelby block price wasn't a major factor for me, relative to the entire Kirkham build. Also, the Shelby block could be made into a 526 or 527 one day, if i so desired. The other blocks at the time couldn't go that big. One last reason, semi-related, is that the Shelby block was considered "beefier" and had the Shelby-specific head studs, which allowed (for lack of a better verb/term) the Shelby alloy block to withstand a higher RPM before going "kablooey." So my alloy purchase had zero to do with emotion and had everything in the world to do with weight savings, price, beefier build, and potentially bigger cubic inches than competitors. As for resale, 66GTK, who seems to buy and sell quite a few Cobras, mostly ERA's I'd speculate, stated that a Cobra with an alloy block is more desirable or sell for a higher price than one with an iron block. And all other things being equal when evaluating a Cobra for purchase, I'd chose the Cobra with the alloy block too. |
Quote:
|
I didn't dyno the assembled engine. it has a 3.98 stroke (428 stroke) - i would have done a 3.78 stroke (stock 427) but there arent any reasonably priced cranks available in that stroke that I was comfortable with.
I do have the BBM heads, with a hydraulic roller cam setup. it's really nice and ridiculously overkill for the task. Blair Patrick did a great job with this for me. He is a true gentleman, and he even put up with my requests to assemble the engine myself after he did all the hard work! I didn't mean to offend RodKnock - But IN MY OPINION, everything about these cars is emotion. The power to weight ratio is well beyond the limits of what we can fully use on the street, and beyond what the chassis can really fully handle. If I want to go to the track, I will do better (faster and safer) in a c5 or c6 or c7 corvette. If I want to go somewhere, any other car can take me there more practically. For me, this car is purely emotion. So, if anyone else wants an aluminum block because it is lighter, or makes their car more valuable to someone, or because they like the aluminum theme, then I 100% support them and, in fact, will openly celebrate their project. this is all about fun and camaraderie. I appreciate all of you as brothers and friends, even though I don't post here too often. (I am one of those unfortunate married individuals who has a wife that does not appreciate my hobby in any way.) But the original question of this thread was asking our opinions about aluminum blocks. In the previous 5 engines I have built (windsor ford for mustang, cleveland for pantera, small block chevy for 57 bel air, and big block chevy for c2 corvette), i have always used iron blocks for cost and reliability. Justin |
Scoffing at extra power, or shaving weight.....i had to check if I was really on a Cobra forum. ;-)
|
Based upon the feedback from the hands-on technical experts in terms of reliability, quality and power output an iron block is preferred. From my personal experience FEs are temperamental enough without adding another variable to the equation.
It also depends on the type of build you’re seeking and Cobra manufacture. For some of the replicas I feel an aluminum block is probably the easiest and best path forward provided the cost is not a concern. For builds where the purpose of an old school is the intention I can see a cast iron block is preferred. So to say an aluminum block is more desirable for resale or worth more depends on the particular car IMO. Everyone has their preference/opinion but would not make an overall claim about aluminum. |
Quote:
Do cast iron blocks make more HP? Everyone seems to think so, Barry and Brent do too. But if folks believe that a 125 lbs of block weight isn't a big deal (5.5% of my Kirkham), then why does a few extra HP with a cast iron block? |
Blair Patrick will also tell you that an iron block will make more horsepower without the "fickle-ness" of an aluminum block. He's not a fan either.
In my mind the horsepower difference between the cast iron block and the aluminum block would almost make up for the weight difference in a straight line, 1/4 mile type deal. A 20-hp difference is a .1 ET difference in the 1/4. There's not that many corner-carvers on here, so I don't know how justified the loss of weight is for most Cobra owners. I think, in my opinion, that to most buyers, "all-aluminum" is a buzz-word, just like "billet" or "roller" or "forged". I wish Richard Hudgins was still active here. I'd like to have a true chassis guy's input on how much the weight difference affects the handling of a Cobra and at what point the "average" driver would be able to tell it. |
This is an interesting conversation to have at this point. Did you have this conversation with all the previous Aluminum block customers you build engines for?
|
A lot of guys will ask about the differences between materials and I think I try to mention it to those that don't.
However, there were engines that were built before I experienced a few quality issues and hassles. Kind of a straw that broke the camel's back type of thing. At some point, you just have to stand back and say, "I just don't feel like doing that anymore." |
Quote:
I would want to be able to get to 482 CI though. It is a toy, not a life saving medical device. |
Quote:
As for differences in HP between the two, post some data dump sheets of two equal engines with the only difference being the block. Lastly, on my way to Starbucks for my morning mocha, there are two sharp turns, and I can feel the difference. :LOL: |
Of course no one is going to complain. It's because all the risks are taken by the engine builders before the customer even sees it. All the customer knows is that they have an all-aluminum engine.
You haven't heard anyone mention that aluminum blocks are fickle? Did you read any of the posts by Barry or myself? You have seen a sample of one engine. I've got a sample size much larger than that.... Starbucks tastes like automatic transmission fluid. (Yes, I've tasted both.) We know you like your engine. That's perfectly fine. I'm not building any more of them, hence the original post from 11 pages back.... :) |
Quote:
Quote:
However- to your statement about "every other" OEM block being just fine in aluminum; well, I also agree- They are "just fine" in OEM applications... But they are not better than iron for high cylinder pressure/high torque applications.... None of them. So, nothing I originally stated was "not true" :cool: Example: the 2017 Corvette Z06. Comes with 650HP from an all aluminum engine, whose design has been rigorously tested to go 100k+ miles. It runs about 10.5psi of boost from the factory. BUT- The moment you take that same Corvette to Lingenfelter Engineering, and say "I want to make 1500+HP" The first thing Lingenfelter is going to do, is try to talk you into upgrading to one of their iron truck blocks, before they even start adding boost. I stand by what I stated: From a strength and durability standpoint, aluminum is not superior to iron for any high pressure/high performance engine block. Aluminum's only advantage is weight... EDIT: WAIT! - I am calling BS on myself - There is indeed another advantage (besides weight) to aluminum, versus iron: Repairability- a cracked aluminum block can usually (but maybe not always) be welded, re-machined, re-sleeved, and re-used, while a cracked iron block is junk 99% of the time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To a "hot rodder", weight savings is a crucial factor when purchasing parts, probably since cavemen inhabited the Earth. Cavemen and cavewomen would search far and wide for a lighter, but strong, club to hit other cavemen with. If you read the Porsche forums, those guys and gals take out their airbags to reduce weight, change wheels and seats, etc., that's how obsessed they are weight savings. Yes, I was kidding about Starbucks coffee. Worst coffee ever. BUT! it's a helluva stock to have in your portfolio. About a 2% dividend and over the past 5 years SBUX has almost tripled in value. :D |
Fickle means that they have a greater chance of developing leaks. Fickle means that there are warm-up and operating guidelines that are a little more strict because of bearing clearance.
A Shelby block is stronger than an original FE block. Not stronger than an aftermarket cast iron block. You do have reduced ring seal from the aluminum block just because things move around so much. We're not driving Porsches. ;) Thanks for the 11 pages of backing-and-forthing. I feel better. |
Quote:
|
Brent, I'm assuming the only reason you're seeing increased HP is due to cast iron's increased thermal retention? Once aluminum heats up and comes up to "designed clearances" ring sealing should be the same as cast iron. Blow-by and effective static or dynamic compression ratios should also be the same as iron. My training leads me to think that the horsepower differences should be minimal. Thoughts?? Just curious...
|
Quote:
Today's "groan" here on CC? Others making global statements about the "reliability, power and quality" of an alloy block versus a cast iron block when at least 8 of 9 (jkg2101 excepted) chose alloy over cast iron for the 125 lbs weight savings. Here's my global statement (maybe a question) for the day. Why in the world would "you" drop an engine with a cast iron block into a Kirkham or alloy CSX? Aren't all the alloy bodied Cobra owners afraid that their alloy bodies might require more maintenance, dent more easily, etc.? Aren't alloy bodies more "fickle" than fiberglass bodies? Don't lean against it? Don't drop any tools on it? And if you own a BNL (bare naked lady), HOLY COW, the extra work to keep it polished is ENORMOUSLY time consuming (it's not). Aluminum is quite "fickle." IMO, there's a disconnect of grand proportions there. |
Quote:
It wouldn't be such a big deal to them, if the Germans hadn't deliberately designed their cars to run around backwards... :3DSMILE::3DSMILE::3DSMILE: just teasin' |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: