Club Cobra

Club Cobra (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/)
-   FE TALK (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/fe-talk/)
-   -   What's the appeal of an aluminum engine block? (http://www.clubcobra.com/forums/fe-talk/137550-whats-appeal-aluminum-engine-block.html)

patrickt 11-23-2016 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1409574)
Happy Thanksgiving all....I'm taking a few days vacation.

Well, that was a definitive posting. Just pm your login password and I'll keep posting in your stead, and piss them off way better than you ever could....:p

RodKnock 11-23-2016 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1409569)
That's fine Dave, it's an accepted fact by engine builders that doesn't need to be argued here.

More global statements, speaking for all engine builders. And it can't be argued?

You're making the Pond and Shelby blocks sound like Pepsi/Coke cans. People use aluminum pistons, rods, cylinder heads, intakes, rocker arms, etc. Until I see at least a good statistical sample of equally built FE engines, built with both cast iron and aluminum blocks, I call BS.

I know we live in a "post truth" or "truthiness" society now, but I need factual data sampling. And you line up 10 engine builders to post here on this thread that agree with you, but it's all hot air until I see real DATA!

It says right on the Shelby website:

"Strong enough to support over 1500 horsepower outputs."

"Shelby's FE alloy block delivers superior bottom end stability at high rpm."

undy 11-23-2016 12:34 PM

Thanks for the detailed explanation Brent. I understand now.

It would seem that ALL FE aluminum blocks suffer from inherent structural design deficiencies. Other alloy OEM blocks (not sure about aftermarket) don't suffer from this at all.

I pulled my heads on my 88K mile LS7 (Z06) engine and the ring sealing/pattern was perfect. That was at elevated HP levels too. It has zero oil consumption and very little, if any, blow-by.

blykins 11-23-2016 12:35 PM

Ok, pot-stirrer....

I didn't say it can't be argued. I said it didn't need to be argued here because that's not what the thread is about.

I'm also not speaking for all engine builders, as I have not talked to every single engine builder in the greater US, but I would take it as a general consensus.

What do you think Shelby's ad is going to say? "Our block squirms around at high horsepower...."

I'm also not on Club Cobra to specifically meet your needs.

RodKnock 11-23-2016 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1409573)
Ok, some data I found from the FE forum since I don't have any dyno sheets to prove my point.

From Dave Shoe (speaking to Robert Pond):

"The horsepower differences between iron nand aluminum blocks have been repeatedly characterized by Robert Pond, though I am necessarily distorting his claims because I lack sufficient experience to fully comprehend all his findings. He has been particularly interested in horsepower gains as small as a single horsepower, as his Stock Eliminator racing engines are constrained in the modifications which are allowed. I've spoken to Robert a little bit about "free horsepower", and he strongly contends that the block, all by itself, can provide dozens of free horsepower between the 600 to 1000 horsepower levels, just by its cylinder rigidity characteristics."

From Barry R, speaking of his Federal Mogul days:

"Well - - I can add a little fuel to the fire.
I supply rings and bearings to a large percentage of Pro Stock, Cup, and fastest street car competitors. In virtually 100% of situations where the weight is not critical (meaning that they would have to add ballast to offset any weight benefit from aluminum to meet a mandated minimum) these competitors ALL run an iron block of some sort.

Iron blocks simply make more power. Every time. The commonly bandied about number is somewhere between 15 and 30 - depending on the power level and the particular engine in question. Big beefy billet caps on aluminum blocks are kinda like a super strong steel lid on a cardboard box - when they're stronger than the parent material the value is limited. Ultimate power handling potential is not an issue - both materials have been proven at levels beyond anything feasable in an FE (I have seen numbers near 3000HP).

When properly prepped and designed, neither material will show bearing issues - but aluminum does require tighter cold clearances. Fuel motors don't count - - repairability is more important than the nominal power difference when you're at that level. The sole benefits to an aluminum block are identical to those of aluminum heads - weight ease of modification and repairability."

Data please! A good statistical sampling too.

All this BS for "dozens of HP" or "15-30 HP"? Oy vey. :rolleyes: OMG!

I'd say lose 25 lbs of fat and stop eating the Havarti cheese, unless it's my favorite, cottage. And see what kind of 1/4 mile times folks can do.

patrickt 11-23-2016 12:37 PM

Personally, I think Brent has posted compelling evidence that iron blocks are superior to aluminum ones.:cool:

RodKnock 11-23-2016 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrickt (Post 1409580)
Personally, I think Brent has posted compelling evidence that iron blocks are superior to aluminum ones.:cool:

Really? As a lawyer, an Internet post is "compelling evidence"? Again, OMG. I'll never hire you. :eek:

Maybe, if I had a dispute over a neighbor's tree or something, but no serious legal matters. :LOL:

patrickt 11-23-2016 12:41 PM

Yep, I think you've lost. Even if you had the popular vote, you still lost.:cool:

blykins 11-23-2016 12:41 PM

Unsubscribing..... ;)

ERANJ 11-23-2016 12:52 PM

I think RodKnock has made many global statements...if you don't agree with my position you're wrong or submit until you see it my way.

RodKnock 11-23-2016 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ERANJ (Post 1409584)
I think RodKnock has made many global statements...if you don't agree with my position you're wrong or submit until you see it my way.

All I'm asking for is to see evidence of the HP difference. We all know the weight difference between a cast iron and alloy block. That's 125 lbs.

And all this discussion over 15-30 HP or "dozens of HP."

And from what Brent and others have said, aluminum shifts around, expands, squirms or whatever, which means that it leaks more? Alloy engines are rebuilt more often? They lose compression because of expansion? How much compression? Does an alloy block engine lose .1 pt, .2 pt, .3 pt, etc. of compression?

Pond and Shelby have been selling blocks for at least 10 years. How many consumers have posted here and complained about their alloy block? Certainly the 8 (or more) alloy block purchasers that have posted here on this thread have not complained about loss of power, lack of reliability and/or quality. Any alloy block consumers feel their alloy blocks are fickle? Seriously, I'm always interested in consumer feedback about various products. I subscribe to Consumer Reports.:LOL:

moore_rb 11-23-2016 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1409583)
Unsubscribing..... ;)


Nice... Look what you guys have done- you've chased off the thread's original poster.... :LOL:

Me too- I'm unsubscribing. This is the first engine related thread where Brent Lykins and I agree 100%, so I'm pulling my chips off the table, and hitting the Cashier's window on my way out of the casino.

Happy Thanksgiving everyone...

Jac Mac 11-23-2016 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RodKnock (Post 1409587)

And from what Brent and others have said, aluminum shifts around, expands, squirms or whatever, which means that it leaks more? Alloy engines are rebuilt more often? They lose compression because of expansion? How much compression? Does an alloy block engine lose .1 pt, .2 pt, .3 pt, etc. of compression?

BBM website.. Alloy block comes with nominal block height of 10.153", Iron 10.170", so Alloy block growth is ~0.017". With factory 1.73" rocker ratio that will cause an increase in valve lash of ~0.029". Thats the block alone without any further increase from alloy heads etc, obviously a problem for any solid cam with recommended hot lash of ~0.022" and would require block heater or similar to start up.

Iron 427 with 11/1 comp ratio will drop to ~10.6/1 in alloy block with same specs, so ~.4 drop in compression.

Brent would be better to simply add a hefty premium to every alloy block build and not waste his time trying to explain cause and effect to those clients.:)

patrickt 11-23-2016 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jac Mac (Post 1409590)
Brent would be better to simply add a hefty premium to every alloy block build and not waste his time trying to explain cause and effect to those clients.:)[/b]

Uhhhh, that's what I said in my first reply way back on page one of this thread.:cool:

RodKnock 11-23-2016 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrickt (Post 1409591)
Uhhhh, that's what I said in my first reply way back on page one of this thread.:cool:

Yes, but Brent answered:

Quote:

Originally Posted by blykins (Post 1408877)
Yeah, in a perfect world, that's how it is.

However, there are certain things called warranties. IMO, the customer should not have to incur damages because of a manufacturing defect either....flat tappet camshaft, aluminum block, bad crank, etc.

I like how you think though....

Also can't just raise my prices to cover things that "might" happen. I would price myself out of every engine build if I had to do that.


patrickt 11-23-2016 02:31 PM

OK, so you're in agreement now that iron blocks are superior to aluminum ones?%/

Three Peaks 11-23-2016 02:35 PM

And the silly season is upon us...... no, wait, the election is over..... I guess we haven't gotten it out of our systems yet.

Carry on, or whatever it is that this thread has become....... ;)

fordracing65 11-23-2016 02:50 PM

Most of the new Cammers I see being built are aluminum blocks. There are like 7 for sale on eBay. Just by Brent and Barry alone I will take them for what their word is and they both agree iron is superior when it comes to FE blocks. I don't have to hear it from anyone else. I take their words as gospel when it comes to FE engines.

RodKnock 11-23-2016 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patrickt (Post 1409593)
OK, so you're in agreement now that iron blocks are superior to aluminum ones?%/

if, and only if:

1. The weight savings of 125 lbs is not meaningful,
2. The extra cost of the alloy block is meaningful,
3. Bling is not your thing,
4. 15-30 HP or "dozens of HP" is meaningful,
5. Steering and nimbleness in corners/turns is not meaningful,
6. greater fuel efficiency, due to less weight is not meaningful.

Under those conditions, yes, cast iron blocks are superior. But only if those 6 conditions have been met.

And, if the argument is that you would never feel the difference of 125 lbs (5 1/2% of my Kirkham's weight), then I don't see how you could argue that the extra 15-30 HP of a cast iron block would be noticed either. You can compensate for the reduced HP of the alloy block by adding compression, changing the cam, intake, etc., but it's mighty difficult to toss out or lose 125 lbs in a Cobra, unless Google or Tesla installs a driverless computer application.

rodneym 11-23-2016 03:33 PM

I'd like to go on the record as stating that my next FE will be iron.

It will be a 332ci with 240HP. That way Pat can keep up ;)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
The representations expressed are the representations and opinions of the clubcobra.com forum members and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and viewpoints of the site owners, moderators, Shelby American, any other replica manufacturer, Ford Motor Company. This website has been planned and developed by clubcobra.com and its forum members and should not be construed as being endorsed by Ford Motor Company, or Shelby American or any other manufacturer unless expressly noted by that entity. "Cobra" and the Cobra logo are registered trademarks for Ford Motor Co., Inc. clubcobra.com forum members agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyrighted material is owned by you. Although we do not and cannot review the messages posted and are not responsible for the content of any of these messages, we reserve the right to delete any message for any reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold us harmless with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). Thank you for visiting clubcobra.com. For full policy documentation refer to the following link: