Main Menu
|
Nevada Classics
|
Advertise at CC
|
April 2024
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
CC Advertisers
|
|
04-11-2009, 05:36 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va & Port Charlotte, Fl.,
Posts: 2,280
|
|
Not Ranked
Dual quads finished, sorta happy
First off... kudos to BarryR and Quickfuel for working through the all the "tweaking" problems. These are Barry's new custom TrickFuel 750s that come built and setup for stroked FEs (around 482" or there about).
I ran the car on the chassis dyno yesterday and was a little disappointed in the numbers but hey, nothing that a 300 shot progressive fogger system won't cure Seriously, I'm thinking about it..
The engine's a typical 600hp Pond based 482 that Keith builds with a hydraulic roller cam. The neat thing about it is that while having a wide-band AFR setup hooked up to an inside mounted welded bung it maintains between 12.8 to 13.0 AFR during all part throttle and cruise... perfect! On the rollers it made between 12.5 to 12.8 AFR .. amazing and perfect. This is as they came out of the box from QuickFuel. It looks like Barry has these nailed! If you're looking for dual quads on your stroked FE I heartily recommend these..
Dave
__________________
Too many toys?? never!
|
-
Advertising
04-11-2009, 05:59 AM
|
|
Senior Club Cobra Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Covington,
wa
Cobra Make, Engine: Superformance # 532, 466 BB, 560HP
Posts: 3,027
|
|
Not Ranked
Looks great.
|
04-11-2009, 06:08 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
|
|
Not Ranked
That's some more to polish, where the choke??
|
04-11-2009, 07:06 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va & Port Charlotte, Fl.,
Posts: 2,280
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by RICK LAKE
|
hmmmmm.... lift off at 140?????? I'll guess I'll need to target that number as my trap speed. Maybe just a 200 shot then??
BTW ..if you figure a 22% parasitic loss crank HP comes in a just over 600. The posted numbers are SAE corrected.
__________________
Too many toys?? never!
Last edited by undy; 04-11-2009 at 07:09 AM..
Reason: adding some more BS...
|
04-11-2009, 08:15 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,391
|
|
Not Ranked
Dave, with your upgraded exhaust, I'd venture to say that the horsepower loss isn't that much.
I would say for the guys running the normal restrictive glass pack mufflers, that 22% is a good estimate.
__________________
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
|
04-11-2009, 09:29 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bartlett,
Ill
Cobra Make, Engine: Everett-Morrison LS1
Posts: 2,448
|
|
Not Ranked
Brent
exhaust isn't used as a criteria for DRIVE LINE loss----the exhaust factor is because of the exhaust and is the same whether engine dyno or chassis dyno
|
04-11-2009, 09:38 AM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Virginia Beach, Va & Port Charlotte, Fl.,
Posts: 2,280
|
|
Not Ranked
That's true that the drive train loss equation does not allow for exhaust, except that engine manufacturers typically use an "optimal", equal length header with minimal restriction mufflers while doing their dyno testing (not to mention electric water pumps, no alternator etc) and making their horsepower claims. The exhaust loss only helps to explain the excessive delta between fwhp and rwhp.
__________________
Too many toys?? never!
|
04-11-2009, 12:11 PM
|
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bartlett,
Ill
Cobra Make, Engine: Everett-Morrison LS1
Posts: 2,448
|
|
Not Ranked
If I was to dyno an engine for someone I would use the exhaust headers/system that was to be run on the car------
For research about parts combinations several combinations of exhaust would be used looking for the best combination, same as for intakes and carbs, rocker ratios, etc
The drive line lost on a chassis dyno is just that, drive line !!
|
04-11-2009, 02:11 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,
KY
Cobra Make, Engine: I'm Cobra-less!
Posts: 9,391
|
|
Not Ranked
Jerry, put an engine on an engine dyno with good headers and exhaust, and then dyno it again with a set of Cobra headers and sidepipes. No, it's not driveline loss, but I see parasitic loss as anything that takes horsepower to use it.
If you take a fresh engine and put it in a car, then put it on a chassis dyno....what's going to be different? Driveline loss and full exhaust loss.
I agree with you 100%....I try to dyno engines with the headers that will be used on the car. Unfortunately, the way that dynos are laid out, a customer can't just run in with a set of mufflers and tailpipes and say that he/she wants it exactly how it will be in the car.
However, put a Cobra on a chassis dyno with a set of Cobra headers/sidepipes. I guarantee that they'll be more loss than if you were running normal full length headers and good mufflers. I would say that there would be a 4-6% difference. That's the 22% that I was referring to.
__________________
www.lykinsmotorsports.com
|
04-11-2009, 02:54 PM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: foresthill,
md
Cobra Make, Engine: era 427cobra stroked 427fe
Posts: 39
|
|
Not Ranked
If you adjust the linkage on that second carb. to come in simultaniosly you will be pleasantly suprised.
|
04-13-2009, 04:30 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Bloomfield,
MI
Cobra Make, Engine:
Posts: 717
|
|
Not Ranked
My thanks go to David for taking the time and effort on getting the carbs sorted out and tested. He has been pretty much the "ideal customer" on these - insisting on getting a quality product and then offerring solid and documented feedback on how they performed at every step.
The secondary carb on this setup can be readily adapted to alternate linkage systems - note that the link pins are removeable and servicable.
__________________
Survival Motorsports
"I can do that....."
Engine Masters Challenge Entries
91 octane - single 4bbl - mufflers
2008 - 429 cid FE HR - 675HP
2007 - 429 cid FE MR - 659HP
2006 - 434 cid FE MR - 678HP
2005 - 505 cid FE MR - 752HP
|
04-13-2009, 05:14 AM
|
CC Member
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: E BRUNSWICK N.J. USA,
Posts: 3,841
|
|
Not Ranked
Exhaust systems on a dyno
Jerry Clayton If you are running a motor on a dyno, 80% of the time it is long tube headers and a either an extension on the collector in the 20"-36" range for getting the best power from that motor. Most dyno cells I have seen don't have enough room to install a set of cobra side pipes. All cobra side pipe are different inside the muffler area. I have 2 sets, one for street with a 2 1/4" outlet before the turn out. They are quiet and kill the HP in my car. I also have a race set with a 3" inlet and outlet inside the muffler housing and there is a big differents. The honest way to check any exhaust system is with a back pressure gauge. WOT throttle at 500 rpms past your max HP numbers. Looking for 1.5 - 2.5 psi buildup for the best exhaust. The cobra is also limited with having a short transition between collector and side muffler. This helps HP but IMO hurts torque. I agree with you drive train loss and exhaust loss to some degree but there are some variables with testing on a engine dyno and chassic dyno. Biggest is the air in the shop. Have seen a 15 HP change between good and crappy air alone. We didnot take into account for wheel slippage on the rollers. New rollers on a dyno perfect readings, worn out dyno wheels and you get silly readings. Had this happen to me for not being able to get the rearend of the car tight enough on the roller to not slip under load. I smoked out a dyno chassic cell with this problem. Rick L.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:03 PM.
|