08-24-2009, 01:32 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Fresno,
CA
Cobra Make, Engine: KMP 184/482ci Shelby
Posts: 14,448
|
|
Not Ranked
Quote:
Originally Posted by Excaliber
This is a plan for the masses, the people, not the rich, wealthy and powerful and that makes perfect sense to me. CEO's, rock stars, movie stars, would you expect them also to give up their personal health care choices as well? For many folks cost is not a factor, good for them. But for MOST folks cost is a huge factor in that they cannot afford ANY health care plan.
The $64K question here suggests that we should level the playing field for health care across the board. Then the unemployed worker with a family who cannot afford insurance would be equal to the POTUS or CEO's or movie stars in terms of health care. Such a plan would deny the rights of the wealthy to purchase the best health care they can afford or are offered as part of their job. Should we then prohibit ANY business from providing any health care above and beyond a set Government standard? This is a ludicrous argument.
Let's also limit the cost of all Government employee personal vehicles, rock star's too, phuck 'em. Everyone drives a 4 cylinder car, no exceptions!  |
Eh...Ernie ol pal, dat's what they intend on doing given time. Where ya been meboyo? 
__________________
Jamo
|
Threaded Mode
