Carroll Shelby and the "left over frames" saga?

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

Actually, you ought to listen to yourself.

Around here I do. I'm the only one who gets the facts and reality. It's all in that authoritative reference you cited to but selectively ignore.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

Around here I do. I'm the only one who gets the facts and reality. It's all in that authoritative reference you cited to but selectively ignore.

That authoritative reference that you so cling to also refers to the CSX4000 as a "true replica." See page 708. Shelby didn't want the word "replica" in his promotional materials, so they brainstormed the nomenclature "component", which became "continuation."

On Page 709, SAAC then references the CSX4000 as a "recreation", not an accurate reproduction.

And of course, the SAAC registry does list another replica called the Kirkham Cobra.

"Silly registry."

[REAL 1]

Bingo. Your catching on!!! Woohoo!!!!

A true replica is defined in Websters. Correct. SAAC's defiinitions vary from dictionary for the stated reasons and rationale. The operative definitional section and categories are set forth beginning on page 30.