Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[twobjshelbys]

Originally Posted by ERANJ

May have to fact check this....is that any different than Chrysler going bankrupt being acquired by Fiat (not sure how the stock changed?) and essentially Chrylser corperation become a new company. So, the original company (CJD) no longer makes the Dodge Challenger replicas?

And the Challengers built using different materials (since the 1970s) by a different company (original Dodge) in a different era and delivered to the consumer in a considerably different fashion is a REPLICA Challenger. Both come with MSO form Dodge/Camaro and Shelby.

Only one that would hold true is Ford with Shelby Mustang GT350/500 or GT40 for that matter.

Jaguar is in the process of building 6 brand spanking new 1964 e-type lightweight cars. Jaguar refers to them as continuation cars. Each will be built to the specificaion of the last Lightweight E-Type delivered in 1964. (Note this statement from the press release makes no mention of "new old stock" parts, these are NEW vehicles using NEW recreation parts.) The cars will carry the unused Lightweight E-type chassis numbers.

Now, because Ford owned Jaguar, does that really make these cars just lowly Fords? How dare they try to deceive the public, for $1M+ each, on these lowly "replicas".

Go ahead, please go to the Jaguar forums and try to make the same arguments you are making here and see how long they will last. Good luck.

[mullen2]

Jaguar Brings the 1964 E-Type Racer Back to Life - WSJ

Love the E-Type! Follow the above link and watch it being built. I would bet the 6 New cars are better built than the originals. Man would I like to get my hands on one of them.

[twobjshelbys]

Originally Posted by mullen2

Jaguar Brings the 1964 E-Type Racer Back to Life - WSJ

Love the E-Type! Follow the above link and watch it being built. I would bet the 6 New cars are better built than the originals. Man would I like to get my hands on one of them.

I love them. I love the looks - lines, shape everything.

But if I were to drop $1M on a car (and that is what Jaguar says, and I'm sure they've all been sold, but I doubt they are only $1M) it would be for a untouched 300SL Gullwing. Another "coulda-woulda-shoulda" event.

P.S. The first comment on the article is from an original E-type (but not LWE, I think) owner in Colorado that DRIVES HIS!!!

[NewYorkGuy]

delete

[NewYorkGuy]

Originally Posted by mullen2

Jaguar Brings the 1964 E-Type Racer Back to Life - WSJ

Love the E-Type! Follow the above link and watch it being built. I would bet the 6 New cars are better built than the originals. Man would I like to get my hands on one of them.

there was a CC member (now banned from site) who put a down payment on one of these jags..

[jhv48]

I was visiting the sacc forum a while ago and none of those guys seem to have any problem referring to their cars as replicas nor do they consider their cars to be originals.

Guess it's just Evan.

[ERANJ]

Originally Posted by jhv48

I was visiting the sacc forum a while ago and none of those guys seem to have any problem referring to their cars as replicas not do they consider their cars to be originals.

Guess it's just Evan.

So the point being what..... that Evan is incorrect because what???????

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by jhv48

I was visiting the sacc forum a while ago and none of those guys seem to have any problem referring to their cars as replicas nor do they consider their cars to be originals.

Guess it's just Evan.

Evan would be shredded by the members of the SAAC Forum, if he claimed his car was a genuine Shelby Cobra.

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

Evan would be shredded by the members of the SAAC Forum, if he claimed his car was a genuine Shelby Cobra.

I'm over there all the time. I've got 0 problems with those guys. Disappointed? Yeah, the owners of the originals have an issue but candidly they can kiss my arse. Most continuation owners see it as I do.
Even if they didn't couldn't care less either. Facts is facts. Parts is parts.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

I'm over there all the time. I've got 0 problems with those guys. Disappointed? Yeah, the owners of the originals have an issue but candidly they can kiss my arse. Most continuation owners see it as I do.
Even if they didn't couldn't care less either. Facts is facts. Parts is parts.

Yes, I'm a member over there too. And you don't pull the same BS there as you do here. That's why you have 0 problems. No surprise there.

[Joe's Garage]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

... Yeah, the owners of the originals have an issue but candidly they can kiss my arse ...

So far I count 3 in your support group, did I miss anyone

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by mullen2

Jaguar Brings the 1964 E-Type Racer Back to Life - WSJ

Love the E-Type! Follow the above link and watch it being built. I would bet the 6 New cars are better built than the originals. Man would I like to get my hands on one of them.

Beautiful car and I've always loved them, but they're not original and therefore replicas. Replicas built by Jaguar.

[twobjshelbys]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

Beautiful car and I've always loved them, but they're not original and therefore replicas. Replicas built by Jaguar.

You are welcome to that opinion but I'm sure if you said that to one of those owners you would be excused from the meeting. The MSO from Jaguar will state otherwise. I'll bet your opinion would just break the heart of one of those 6 lucky people and make them turn into a babbling bowl of jelly and cause the to fall on a sword.

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by twobjshelbys

You are welcome to that opinion but I'm sure if you said that to one of those owners you would be excused from the meeting. The MSO from Jaguar will state otherwise. I'll bet your opinion would just break the heart of one of those 6 lucky people and make them turn into a babbling bowl of jelly and cause the to fall on a sword.

Gee thats funny. I don't think he would be too welcome at a meeting of Continuation Cobra owners either. Hmmm.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by twobjshelbys

You are welcome to that opinion but I'm sure if you said that to one of those owners you would be excused from the meeting. The MSO from Jaguar will state otherwise. I'll bet your opinion would just break the heart of one of those 6 lucky people and make them turn into a babbling bowl of jelly and cause the to fall on a sword.

I would tell them that if you build something that approximates another something which was built 50 years earlier, then you're building a replica. If it's not original, then it's a replica.

The MSO isn't considered logic. Look at Shelby replica MSO's, they state 1965 and Ned has already said that's fraudulent, since they weren't built in 1965.

Logic says not original.

[twobjshelbys]

Originally Posted by RodKnock

I would tell them that if you build something that approximates another something which was built 50 years earlier, then you're building a replica. If it's not original, then it's a replica.

The MSO isn't considered logic. Look at Shelby replica MSO's, they state 1965 and Ned has already said that's fraudulent, since they weren't built in 1965.

Logic says not original.

The word is continuation. Repeat after me con-tin-u-a-shun

How is that fradulent? Quote me chapter and verse and make a charge in any ( federal, district,state or even small claims) court. Come on ned. And rod. Put up or shut up. No 10 word discussion response here show me a specific section of the us code that is being violated. Note such a claim would also have to apply to the superformance gt40 continuations among others. Where is the charge? Surely the fbi wouldn't let such fraud continue unchecked.

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by twobjshelbys

The word is continuation. Repeat after me con-tin-u-a-shun

How is that fradulent? Quote me chapter and verse and make a charge in any ( federal, district,state or even small claims) court. Come on ned. And rod. Put up or shut up. No 10 word discussion response here show me a specific section of the us code that is being violated. Note such a claim would also have to apply to the superformance gt40 continuations among others. Where is the charge? Surely the fbi wouldn't let such fraud continue unchecked.

You must have selective amnesia. I may have to put YOU on my version of Evan's "I'm not going on that merry-go-round from hell again" list.

Tony, we've had this discussion already in this thread. I posted at least a couple threads from Robert Morgester, at that time, the Assistant CA AG. He was prosecuting criminal cases where folks tried to register their cars as 1965's. I'm not going to continue to repeat myself over and over again and then have you bring up the same discussion 20-30 pages later. It is ILLEGAL in CA to register a modern replica, like my Kirkham Cobra, as a model year 1965. That's why they have the 500 SPCNS exemptions each year. In CA, you register by the year manufactured, which in my case was 2007.

Seriously, no one cares about your Mexican-built Green Bay Packer Edition CSX that you used to own many years ago. If your car was not made in 1965, then it would be illegal or FRAUDULENT in CA to register it TODAY as a 1965. And that is a fact. But if you prefer selective amnesia, then that's fine.