Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[REAL 1]

Very simply the SAAC position in 2004 is clear. Same position today. It's all the 4th Edition of the World Registry.

Already discussed the add which was clarified as I recall based on the SAAC statement as existed in 2004 years before the litigation SAAC had with CS as the "curator" claimed. You are welcome to think I was trying to pass the car off as an original. The two buyers who were fighting over the car knew exactly what it was.

Fact is the majority here refer to the cars as Cobras. When in actuality they are not. Only Shelbys original and current production along with those select few have that "distinction" according to SAAC and the 4th World Registry.

Ironically many here have them registered as '65s or '66's which they are not. False. They are in fact pretend Cobras to get right to it. Nothing wrong with that it's just what it is. I guess many of you are insulted to be told what you already know but don't want to really say.

Ironically, many here have plates that state expressly or impliedly represent they have and are driving a Cobra or 65 Cobra or 66 Cobra.

No insults needed. Just the facts, law and registry.