Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by REAL 1

You haven't grasped this yet. I don't need to try to "establish" or prove anything The facts, law and the Registry do that for me.

You guys are spinning so much to trying prove your ridiculous points you make Whirling Dervishes look like they are standing still.

Carry on.

P.S. the only reason I respond to you is that you at least have the decency not to personally attack like a juvenile child. Kudos to you for that at least. The others, I don't even read their posts any longer. Waste of time.

Absolutely I don't want to personally attack anyone. That's not me and not my area of expertise.

And the law is not my area of expertise, so I don't cite or interpret decisions, suits, claims, redress, what judges said or meant, etc. I'm not a lawyer. But as I've said a 100 times, and many have already concluded, the modern Shelby Cobra is replica. And replicas can't be genuine, real or authentic. Additionally, I'll rest my hat, as it were, on the references to the car as a replica in the Registry plus Ned Scudder, one of the leading historians of the marque stating its a replica.

The facts, the Registry, Ned, and most of all, logic.