Give up a 991 GT3 for a Superformance GT40?

[MHNCO]

The problem with Porsches is its hard to distinguish between a $195k GT3 and a ubiquitous clapped out daily driven $35k CS which can be found all over the place. They all look like VWs to me. Buy what you like.

[Bernica]

Originally Posted by MHNCO

The problem with Porsches is its hard to distinguish between a $195k GT3 and a ubiquitous clapped out daily driven $35k CS which can be found all over the place. They all look like VWs to me. Buy what you like.

Well, that says it all I guess....

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by Bernica

Well, that says it all I guess....

That's a troll-like comment for sure.

[Bernica]

Sounding like we have another NYG, or maybe he just re-branded himself.

[NewYorkGuy]

Originally Posted by Bernica

Sounding like we have another NYG, or maybe he just re-branded himself.

hmmm? No, I am the Original. This new guy writes and behaves like Evan/Real1 of GT40s.

Personally, it's a good problem to have, choosing between gt40 kit-car or gt3. can't go wrong either way.
Your ego will be stroked at every car show. Old guys will wet their panties over nostalgia Gt40 BS. Young Guys will cream for gt3 urban myth

[RodKnock]

Originally Posted by MHNCO

The problem with Porsches is its hard to distinguish between a $195k GT3 and a ubiquitous clapped out daily driven $35k CS which can be found all over the place. They all look like VWs to me. Buy what you like.

First, it may be hard to distinguish between different 911's for you or the general public, but most of us car aficionados know the difference.

Second, we're talking about a replica of 1960's race car. In 20-30-40 years, it will still be a replica of a 1960's race car. Beautiful, no doubt, Some low production modern 911's may already be blue chip investments, if not now, likely in the future.

Third, your earlier post referred to 911's not being "blue chip investments." It had nothing to do with "looks." Now you're talking about comparing looks. Yes, the GT40 is gorgeous.