Why does every thread here devolve into a "Real" vs. "Replica" argument?

[REAL 1]

Originally Posted by Dimis

It's comments like this, that give Evan and co the right to claim "sour grapes".

Maybe they don't want an SPF chassis?
Maybe they want to replicate the experience of driving an original style chassis.

Its each persons individual call as to what they desire...
If that's the case the csx is the better replica... No?

But for me that there is the point.
They're all copies of the real thing, just to different degrees.
While some stop at the chassis, others the engine or shape, others the badges.
The continuation series cars stop at history and the year of manufacturing and some even at the composition of the body.

I appreciate your comments. You are entitled to your opinion and you analysis. I respect that. I won't try and convince you otherwise except to say you should read the Registry. If you disagree with the Registry then fine. Free country here and I suppose down there too.

However, I think you are clearly erroneous based on the facts, law and as made clear and explained by the Registry. Its all in the Registry and made crystal clear. Misuse of terms like "replica" are explained. You and others continue to "misuse" those terms but if that's what a "replica" means to you great. But again you are free to carry on as you wish, think what you think and believe what you want being wrong the entire time. Not all who disagree with me are suffering from sour grapes. But it's clear by the tone and tenor many are.

Have a great day.